Find out why Suarez's CAS appeal may succeed

Friday, 08 August 2014 Author: John Mehrzad KC

This article proposes to look in more depth at the arguments that are likely to be raised during Luis Suarez’s appeal hearing before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) against his ban by FIFA for nine matches and four months from all football-related activity.¹

High threshold

Whilst the Uruguayan FA and FC Barcelona have sounded confident in the lead up to Suarez’s CAS hearing, they will be aware of the high threshold that they will need to overcome to successful appeal against his ban.

Whilst CAS generally hears matters de novo (i.e. afresh)², it will only interfere with a discretionary disciplinary sanction (such as in the present case) where the level of ban given by the governing body, in this case FIFA, is “irrational”; in other words it is “obviously unreasonable or perverse”.³ Indeed, CAS has repeatedly reminded itself that it will only intervene on sanction in “exceptional circumstances”.⁴

Realistically Suarez will know that he will still face a ban come what may before CAS. Properly directed, the questions he should therefore ask CAS to determine concern not the principle of the ban itself but rather its (a) scope and (b) length.

In a nutshell, Suarez’s best two grounds of appeal to achieve either or both are:

FIFA did not have the power to ban him from domestic club games;
and/or,A ban from “all football-related activity” for 4 months or at all is disproportionate.

Domestic ban

This ground is a technical, legal one based on the proper construction of the FIFA Disciplinary Code (“FDC”).

In terms of the applicable regulatory framework, art. 38.2 a) of the FDC provides:

“Match suspensions in relation to an expulsion pronounced on a player outside of a competition [separate match(es)] or not served during the competition for which they were intended (elimination or the last match in the competition) are carried over as follows:

a) FIFA World CupTM: carried over to the representative team’s subsequent official match.”

The above provision is clear; sanctions given under the FDC are in relation to the “representative team”, i.e. national team competing in the World Cup, namely Uruguay only. In short, whilst FIFA may ban a player from international games for their country, the general rule is that club matches cannot be included in a ban.

To continue reading or watching login or register here

Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.

Hits 26225 Posted in Sports | Blogs | Football | Littleton Chambers

Tags: 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil | Brazil | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | FIFA | FIFA Disciplinary Code | FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber | FIFPro | Football | Restraint of trade

Written by

John Mehrzad KC

John Mehrzad KC is a Barrister at Fountain Court Chambers specialising in sports law, employment and commercial disputes, across the fields of litigation, domestic and international arbitration as well as cross-border matters.

He was appointed as a silk after only 12 full years’ practice – the fastest barrister appointee of the 2019 competition. More recently, he was listed in The Lawyer’s “Hot 100 2023”, and he has been described in the legal directories as “exceptional and a true heavyweight in his field” with the recommendation that “if you want to win – you want him on your side before the opposition snaps him up”. He was nominated as ‘Sports Law Silk of the Year’ by The Legal 500 in 2022 and 2023.