CAS decision provides guidance on Football Club ‘sporting succession’ in Romania
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”), in its recent award in CAS 2021/A/8331 Victor Pițurcă v. RFF & U Craiova 1948 SA (“CAS Award”), confirmed the decisions passed by the judicial bodies of the Romanian Football Federation (“RFF”) where several legal issues, including national insolvency law, were brought up.
This article discusses this case and its implications for sporting succession in football.
To understand more about the concept of sporting succession, please see this article on LawInSport[1].
The author represented the RFF in this case.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Corporate Law | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Dispute Resolution | FIFA Disciplinary Code | FIFA Statutes | Football | Regulation & Governance | Romania | Sport
Related Articles
- Who Is Competent To Decide Upon The “Sporting Successor” Of A Football Club?
- Football Law Experts Discuss The Challenges And Opportunities Of Sporting Succession
- Swiss Federal Tribunal Rules That Sporting Succession Is Compatible With Public Policy
- Sporting succession in basketball: FIBA applies great flexibility in determining sporting successor
Written by
Paul Ciucur
Paul is the managing partner at Maier, Ciucur & Partners Law Firm, Bucharest/Timisoara, Romania.
Global Summit 2024