Do Anti-Doping Rules Apply In Retirement? (UKAD v Ben Harrison)
Former international rugby league player has been been banned for four years from all sports by United Kingdom Anti-Doping Limited (UKAD) after testing positive for a banned substance.
This article reviews the case. Readers will learn about the anti-doping rules relating to the retirement of professional athletes and their subsequent return to competition.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Anti-Doping | Rugby | Rugby League | UKAD_ integrity | WADA Code
Related Articles
- Scandals and drugs but no rock and roll – pro sport in Australia under the anti doping microscope
- Must athletes prove how a banned substance entered their body to establish lack of intention?
- Fighting Doping In Sport: How Spain's Bureaucracy Is Undermining The Athlete Biological Passport
- What are the key changes to WADA’s Prohibited List 2023?
Written by
Maria Pia Tribelhorn
Maria Pia is an Attorney-at-Law based in Zurich, Switzerland. After being an Associate at a law firm in Zurich, she currently works as a Legal Counsel at a renowned Swiss Private Bank. Even if Maria Pia is not actively working in the sports law industry, she likes to embed herself in the area by reading and writing articles about it. She is also a member of the international Association Women in Sports Law (WiSLaw).
Global Summit 2024