Skip to main content

USA Fencing Decision Is Lenient on Match Fixing and Undermines the Integrity of Sport

USA Fencing Decision Is Lenient on Match Fixing and Undermines the Integrity of Sport

30 April 2024: USA Fencing athletes are aggrieved by the recent decision by USA Fencing to enact a weak and futile suspension on two American fencing referees.

Yesterday’s decision by USA Fencing to sanction Mr. Jacobo Morales and Mr. Brandon Romo for only nine months after being found guilty of violating the USA Fencing Referee Code of Ethics, the FIE Technical Rules and the FIE Ethical Code undermines the ethics of the sport and every athlete who strives for success on the grounds of fair play.

Fencers, like all athletes, are required and expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity when competing. When athletes fail to do so, swift sanctions and consequences are enacted. This decision, however, highlights the discrepancy in accountability standards between athletes and officials, with the latter often receiving minimal repercussions for breaking the rules of sport, as evidenced in this case. This decision provides zero deterrence for match manipulation and leaves athletes, who dedicate their lives to the sport, vulnerable to unfair refereeing and match-fixing.

These officials, who are not competing for medals, are expected to uphold the rules of the sport with integrity. Yet, they have undermined the very fiber of sport – a level playing field – and are facing inconsequential repercussions. If USA Fencing is committed to protecting the rules and integrity of their sport, these officials must receive multi-year suspensions.

Furthermore, based on this decision and with a pending second investigation yet to be complete, USA fencing has set a precedent that leniency is afforded to officials who break the rules. How can athletes have confidence that the sport will abide by its own rules that were established to protect athletes and fair play when decisions, as per this case, indirectly endorse match manipulation?

Importantly, the investigation and USA Fencing has failed to recognize this event was an Olympic qualifier. USA Fencing has yet to redistribute competition points to ensure justice prevails. If USA Fencing cares about fair sport this must be immediately implemented.

As athletes head into the Paris Olympic Games, USA Fencing and the International Fencing Federation have a responsibility to clean up the sport and enact tough sanctions on match manipulation to not only avoid a cloud of suspicion overshadowing the performances in Paris but to ensure that all fencers in Paris have fairly earnt their position and will compete on a level piste.

On behalf of,

Select members of the USA Fencing Team

The ITA has notified fencer Anna Kun (Hungary) of a potential anti-doping rule violation

The ITA has notified fencer Anna Kun (Hungary) of a potential anti-doping rule violation

The ITA confirms that Hungarian fencer Anna Kun has been notified of a potential Anti-Doping Rule Violation pursuant to article 2.4 of the FIE Anti-Doping Rules (“FIE ADR”), namely the occurrence of three Whereabouts Failures within a twelve month period1.

The case will be referred to the FIE Doping Disciplinary Tribunal in charge of hearings and adjudication of anti-doping matters.

Pursuant to the FIE ADR and World Anti-Doping Code, Anna Kun is not subject to a mandatory provisional suspension pending the resolution of the matter.

Given that the case is underway, there will be no further comments during the ongoing proceedings.

Upcoming Events