When is an athlete’s management agreement in restraint of trade? Lessons from Hamilton Management Group v. Paul Di Resta case
In this article Nina Goolamali, head of the Sports Team at 2 Temple Gardens, reviews the doctrine of restraint of trade in the context of Formula 1®racing following the Hamilton Management Group v Paul Di Resta litigation in which she was instructed by Paul Di Resta as Junior Counsel, led by Paul Downes QC (also of 2 Temple Gardens).
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Commercial Law | Contract Law | Employment Law | Football | Formula 1 | Litigation | Motorsport | Player Contracts | Restraints of Trade | United Kingdom (UK)
Related Articles
- 2014 technical regulations for F1® racing have affected the competitive balance between factory and customer teams
- Caterham redundancies and the unlikely connection between employment and libel law
- How new safety car protocols could make Formula 1® safer
- Formula 1® financing: an analysis of how Caterham and Marussia entered administration
Written by
Nina Goolamali KC
A powerhouse... She knows both the law and the market inside out. A brilliant team leader and a formidable opponent.”
The Legal 500
Nina Goolamali KC is highly regarded as a skilled and commercially astute advocate in her chosen fields of personal injury and sport. Described as being “one of the go-to KCs” who “prepares impeccably” and “inspires confidence”, she is regularly instructed on behalf of Defendants in multi-million pound press sensitive cases especially when a new duty or standard of care is being advanced.
Global Summit 2024