Basketball Arbitral Tribunal - [name of Claimant 1], [name of Claimant 2] v/ [name of Respondent] – BAT 1764/21

The [nationality of Claimant 1] Player, [name of Claimant 1], and his FIBA Licensed Agent, [name of Claimant 2], filed a claim against the [name of the country where the Respondent is from] Club, [name of the Respondent], for outstanding salaries, meal compensation, agent fees, tax certificates, penalties and interest. The Claimants submitted that the Respondent improperly terminated the Contract. In its Answer, the Respondent argued that the termination was valid because the Player failed the initial medical examination. The claim was dismissed.

Arbitral Award

Thursday, 25 May 2023

• Arbitral Award Basketball Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (BAT) Dispute Resolution Governance Regulation