World Rugby to protect officials and players from online abuse during Rugby World Cup 2023
- World Rugby is partnering with Signify Group to protect its online community and take action against hate speech and abuse
- Core wellbeing service will operate across all match officials and teams at Rugby World Cup 2023
- World Rugby sending a clear zero-tolerance statement that online abuse will be monitored and action taken where necessary
- Wellbeing of participants a priority for World Rugby and its national unions
World Rugby has today announced that it will implement transformative measures to protect all match day officials and team squad players from online abuse during Rugby World Cup France 2023.
The move underpins World Rugby's wider commitment to promote and protect the sport’s values and Rugby World Cup 2023’s mantra as the sport’s greatest celebration of togetherness, driving positive change.
World Rugby is partnering with data science company Signify Group who will use its AI-driven Threat Matrix service to put an online protective shield around all tournament match officials, players and coaches. The service will include:
- Proactive real-time monitoring from open-source data on key platforms including X [formerly Twitter] and Instagram across the tournament
- Coverage in over 30 languages including images and emojis
- Daily reporting of abusive content and accounts to platforms to ensure appropriate action is taken
- Expedite abusive content take-down/sanctioning of account holders - where platform community guidelines are evidenced to have been broken
- Provide evidence to national associations to ban individuals from domestic and international rugby events
- Most egregious cases have the potential to be reported to relevant law enforcement agencies and an ability to unmask the worst abusers who hide behind ‘fake’ accounts.
World Rugby Chief Executive Alan Gilpin said: “Rugby is a sport for everyone and we take our responsibility very seriously to make the sport as inclusive, accessible and relevant as possible. This includes sending a strong message that online hate simply will not be tolerated, tackling abuse and harmful content with meaningful action."
World Rugby Chief Communications Officer Dominic Rumbles added: “Doing everything we can to set a good example and protect players and match officials is important to World Rugby and our unions, and extending that welfare to the arena of social media is both logical and timely.
"Abuse, on or off the field, has no place in our game and today's announcement shows just how focused we are in tackling online hate aimed at the rugby family – working in partnership with proven experts Signify. This development also reflects our wider tournament goals to drive positive change and celebrate togetherness and unity; all part of a wider journey that World Rugby is very much focused on delivering.”
Jonathan Hirshler, CEO of Signify Group, said: “We are delighted to be working with World Rugby to help create a safer online space to ensure officials and players can be 100 per cent focused on their on-field responsibilities, and not be distracted and potentially harmed by vile online abuse. More and more sporting bodies are starting to take this issue seriously and it is great to be working with World Rugby where welfare is so core to its philosophy, in a sport built on respect, to drive positive change.”
Who is a ‘publisher’ in the context of defamatory material posted on a social media website? (Fairfax v Voller)
Published Friday, 02 December 2022.
Rio Ferdinand tells MPs football is ‘sliding backwards’ because of racist abuse online
Former Manchester United and England defender Rio Ferdinand has told MPs that football is "sliding backwards" and racism is being normalised because of the frequent racist abuse online.
Criminal law sanctions for online racist abuse in football
Published Friday, 07 May 2021.
Sport and commercial law – the year in review 2018/19
Published Monday, 20 May 2019.
The art of million dollar sports media rights deals: An interview with Bobby Hacker - Episode 50
INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin - 26 December 2016 - 8 January 2017
Key sponsorship trends in the use of technology and data: Part 2 – Legal considerations
What the social media revolution means for sports fans and rights holders
Sharing sports clips in the digital age: 6 things you should know
Published Tuesday, 28 June 2016.
What Twitter's deal with the NFL means for the future of sports media rights
Published Friday, 15 April 2016.
10 articles that explain some of the legal considerations when using technology in sport
New guidance on how clubs should treat social media misconduct by footballers
Published Tuesday, 03 February 2015.
How social media and smart devices are influencing the negotiation of Sports Media Rights Agreements
Published Tuesday, 11 November 2014.
5 key steps to help protect sports-stars from reputational damage
The 6 Second Vine, Football Broadcasting & the Premier League
Published Friday, 22 August 2014.
Following loss before the Supreme Court, Aereo “astonishes” broadcasters with new legal strategy
Published Monday, 28 July 2014.
#update: The evolution of the twitter ‘#’ disclosure rules
Published Monday, 07 October 2013.
#acknowledge: advertising compliance on social media - the solution for stars & sponsors is to get creative
Published Wednesday, 26 June 2013.
Social media and reputation management - what’s over the marksman’s line?
Published Monday, 29 April 2013.
Brand reputation: what can Joey Barton teach sports stars about dealing with offensive tweets?
Published Friday, 19 April 2013.
Chucking phones out of the dressing room to stop throwing games on the pitch - Part 1
Published Wednesday, 20 February 2013.
Off the field and on to the feed: tackling racism online - Part 3 of 3
Published Wednesday, 06 February 2013.
Off the field and on to the feed: tackling racism online - Part 1 of 3
Published Wednesday, 30 January 2013.
Joint statement from The FA, Premier League, EFL, PFA and Kick It Out on Online Safety Bill
We welcome the passing of the Online Safety Bill and are pleased that English football has played a prominent role in the development of this legislation.
It is a significant moment for those who participate in the game as the Bill will hold social media companies to account and we look forward to working closely with Ofcom on its implementation.
We encourage the government to ensure that Ofcom and law enforcement are fully equipped to challenge social media companies if they fail to protect their users.
But social media companies don’t need to wait. They can introduce better tools right now so that users have a better experience, free from unwanted and damaging discrimination.
Millwall's Head Of Youth Recruitment, Barry Dunn, Suspended For Eight Weeks
Millwall's head of youth recruitment, Barry Dunn, has been suspended from all football and football related activity for eight weeks with immediate effect, fined £525, ordered to attend a mandatory face-to-face education programme and has received a reprimand and warning as to his future conduct, for a breach of misconduct in relation to social media activity.
It was alleged that he interacted with a social media post that is insulting and/or indecent and/or improper contrary to FA Rule E3.1.
It was further alleged this activity constitutes an 'aggravated breach', which is defined in FA Rule E3.2, as the post included a reference - whether express or implied - to religion or belief.
Barry Dunn admitted the charge and his sanctions were subsequently imposed by an independent Regulatory Commission following a personal hearing.
The FA V Marc Bola – Dealing With Historical Aggravated Breaches
Published Friday, 25 March 2022.
Guidance For Athletes On Social Media Use And Reviewing Historic Posts
Published Thursday, 15 July 2021.
Inappropriate Tweets & The 'Duty Of Curiosity': Why The Swiss Federal Tribunal Ordered The Sun Yang Case Be Reheard
Published Friday, 19 March 2021.
25 key articles on trade marks in sports
#Sport: The digital battle between sponsors, rights holders and ambush marketers
Published Thursday, 13 July 2017.
LawInSport & Keltie host Sports IP Seminar
The winning formula for a successful sports brand: five key points
Key legal issues ahead of the Rio Olympic and Paralympic Games
Is sharing sports clips on social media an infringement of copyright under UK, European, Australian & US law?
Published Thursday, 12 May 2016.
Do sports clip sharing apps breach copyright law? A review of the “Fanatix” case
Published Thursday, 31 March 2016.
AFC Disciplinary Committee sanctions player for social media misuse
Key sports law cases and developments to watch in 2015
Digital and social media rights: Can the fans be forced to take down online goal videos and should they be?
Published Thursday, 23 October 2014.
How is sport professionalising its “Twitterati”? Morality clauses, regulation and enforcement
Published Monday, 01 September 2014.
Aereo infringes broadcasters’ copyrights, US Supreme Court rules – coming impact for streaming and cloud services
Published Friday, 11 July 2014.
Sochi 2014: Propaganda, Olympic principles and social media
Published Monday, 03 February 2014.
A ‘Bum Deal’ for Huddersfield Giants
Published Tuesday, 17 September 2013.
Gambling with your brand? ASA issues judgment on gambling ads on social media
Published Monday, 20 May 2013.
Is there a right to be offensive?
Published Thursday, 25 April 2013.
Don’t be cagy with your Tweets: FTC guidance on paid promotions
Published Friday, 05 April 2013.
Social media tamed? Trepidation in the upper echelons of sports organisations
Published Tuesday, 19 February 2013.
Off the field and on to the feed: tackling racism online - Part 2 of 3
Published Monday, 04 February 2013.
Referee decisions and tackles on Twitter, do players understand the offside rules of social media?
Published Friday, 18 January 2013.